How Methodism Lost Its Way| Seedbed

Open Bible with Jesus names and attributes.

" data-medium-file="https://remonstrancepodcastdotcom.files.wordpress.com/2016/08/thinkstockphotos-489909082.jpg?w=300" data-large-file="https://remonstrancepodcastdotcom.files.wordpress.com/2016/08/thinkstockphotos-489909082.jpg?w=490"/>

By Andrew Dragos

Link to Article: Seedbed.com

Anyone observing the American religious landscape can note the incongruity between today’s form of Methodism and the vibrant historical movement that gave birth to the First Great Awakening in Britain and made its way to the colonies in America. While some Wesleyan-Methodist denominations remain faithful to historic Christian orthodoxy, others have for decades flirted with theological traditions and moral positions that would compromise the character of God’s church and its gospel message.

Many are left simply wondering, How did we get here? When did membership begin to decline? What caused the shift from understanding Jesus as the unique God-man to a person with a kind of God-consciousness? When did the pervasiveness of sin and humanity’s depravity become downplayed? These kind of questions are often aided by an analysis of the theological currents at work in leading scholars and influential institutions.

Three particular Methodist theologians from the 19th to early 20th centuries serve as representative models for the theological shifts in Methodism. This infographic is based on the classic study, Theological Transition in American Methodism: 1790-1935 (Abingdon Press, 1965) by Robert E. Chiles. In this dated yet critical work, he traces three potent theological themes and how they were transformed by these figures from the classic positions taught by John Wesley toward positions that pushed the boundaries of Christian orthodoxy. Though they meant well enough and the differences are seemingly insignificant, the result was a capitulation to then prevailing cultural ideologies which have since gone in and out of vogue, and in the process, have compromised the gospel in genuine ways.

Richard Watson (1781-1833)

A British Methodist and the first important systematic theologian following John Wesley. His Theological Institutes was widely read and used by pastors and educators. Outside of theological studies, he was a leading opponent of slavery and served as secretary to the Wesleyan Missionary Society.

John Miley (1813-1895)

An American Methodist who held many pastoral appointments and served as chair of systematic theology at Drew Theological Seminary. His two-volume Systematic Theology was a comprehensive exposition of Wesleyan-Arminianism and served as the primary text for pastors and seminarians for decades to come.

Albert C. Knudson (1873-1953)

An American Methodist who taught at Boston University and whose chief works were The Doctrine of God and The Doctrine of Redemption. As dean he became influential in the liberal school of theology known as Boston personalism.

From Revelation to Reason

  • Richard Watson worked to establish evidence for Christian theology external to and authenticating of Scripture.
  • John Miley sought sources for theology outside of revelation, especially those found in the created world.
  • Albert Knudson emphasized the power of reason to not only authenticate but give shape to religious experience, or revelation.

From Sinful Man to Moral Man

  • Richard Watson denied original guilt tied to the fall and established the absence of the Holy Spirit as the essence of human depravity.
  • John Miley affirmed common depravity but denied its basis for guilt, instead, only actual sins committed are liable to punishment.
  • Albert Knudson established persons as fundamentally moral beings who at all times retain the power of personal, moral choices.

From Free Grace to Free Will

  • Richard Watson interpreted prevenient grace as the persuasive rather than decisive work of the Holy Spirit.
  • John Miley denied that justice was a quality inherent to God’s nature that must punish sin, and atonement solves the needs of others.
  • Albert Knudson reinterpreted salvation as an improvement of conditions, coming as a result of a free choice rather than divine rescue.

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s